GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Blackwell vs Lanning

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BlackwellWinner
88.7

Blackwell wins: Longevity, Statistics

Lanning
88.7

Lanning wins: Dominance, Peak

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/alex-blackwell-vs-meg-lanning

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Alex Blackwell
88.7

Blackwell leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Won four T20 World Cups and two 50-over World Cups with Australia.

1. Alex Blackwell
88.7
2. Meg Lanning
88.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Meg Lanning5 years played · career day 2,190277 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Alex Blackwell5 years played · career day 1,825154 runs
-44.4% vs Lanning at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Blackwell002046154342
🇦🇺 Lanning00045217472

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBlackwellRetiredLanningRetired
World Cup titles27
T20 World Cup titles4
ODI matches144
ODI runs3,311
International seasons16
ODI centuries15
International runs8,352
ODI average53.51
Commonwealth golds1
Wins as captain150
Dominance w25%8288
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%9082
Honours w20%9292
Statistics w15%9290

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Blackwell88.7
Lanning88.7
The people
Blackwell
Lanning

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Blackwell vs Lanning. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →