Who is better, Hannum or Taurasi?
Diana Taurasi leads with a GOAT score of 94.2 against 87.8 for Alex Hannum — a gap of 6.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Diana Taurasi above Alex Hannum: 94.2 vs 87.8. Diana Taurasi leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours. Alex Hannum leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Taurasi wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Hannum wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/alex-hannum-vs-diana-taurasi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Taurasi leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Hannum — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Hannum — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | HannumRetired | TaurasiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA championships | 2 | — |
| ABA championships | 1 | — |
| Career coaching wins | 649 | — |
| Coach of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Seasons as a head coach | 15 | — |
| WNBA points | — | 10,646 |
| WNBA titles | — | 3 |
| Olympic golds | — | 6 |
| All-Star selections | — | 11 |
| Finals MVP | — | 1 |
| Seasons played | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 94 |
Diana Taurasi leads with a GOAT score of 94.2 against 87.8 for Alex Hannum — a gap of 6.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hannum scores higher on peak. Taurasi leads on dominance, honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hannum: 87.8, Taurasi: 94.2.
Make your case for Hannum vs Taurasi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.