GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Olmedo vs Dimitrov

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
OlmedoWinner
79.3

Olmedo wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Dimitrov
79.1

Dimitrov wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/alex-olmedo-vs-grigor-dimitrov

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇪 Alex Olmedo
79.3

Olmedo leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Won Wimbledon and the Australian title in 1959 and led the USA to the Davis Cup.

1. Alex Olmedo
79.3
2. Grigor Dimitrov
79.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇵🇪 Alex Olmedo5 seasons played · career day 1,82615 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇬 Grigor Dimitrov5 seasons played · career day 2,92111 titles
-26.7% vs Olmedo at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇪 Olmedo00131221
🇧🇬 Dimitrov0000114

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricOlmedoRetiredDimitrovActive
Grand Slam singles titles2
Davis Cup titles1
Wimbledon titles1
World ranking high1
Career span in years11
ATP Finals titles1
ATP titles9
Masters 1000 titles1
Career-high ranking3
Career match wins450
Dominance w25%7672
Peak w20%9286
Longevity w20%6886
Honours w20%8072
Statistics w15%8282

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Olmedo79.3
Dimitrov79.1
The people
Olmedo
Dimitrov

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Olmedo vs Dimitrov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →