GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Olmedo vs Nishikori

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
NishikoriWinner
79.5

Nishikori wins: Longevity, Statistics

Olmedo
79.3

Olmedo wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/alex-olmedo-vs-kei-nishikori

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Kei Nishikori
79.5

Nishikori leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. First Asian man to reach a Grand Slam singles final, at the 2014 US Open.

1. Kei Nishikori
79.5
2. Alex Olmedo
79.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇵🇪 Alex Olmedo5 seasons played · career day 1,82615 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Kei Nishikori5 seasons played · career day 2,1914 titles
-73.3% vs Olmedo at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇪 Olmedo00131221
🇯🇵 Nishikori0001310

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricOlmedoRetiredNishikoriActive
Grand Slam singles titles2
Davis Cup titles1
Wimbledon titles1
World ranking high1
Career span in years11
ATP titles12
Grand Slam finals1
Olympic medals1
Career-high ranking4
Career match wins450
Dominance w25%7674
Peak w20%9286
Longevity w20%6882
Honours w20%8074
Statistics w15%8284

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Nishikori79.5
Olmedo79.3
The people
Olmedo
Nishikori

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Olmedo vs Nishikori. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →