Who is better, Olmedo or Noah?
Yannick Noah leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.3 for Alex Olmedo — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yannick Noah above Alex Olmedo: 79.4 vs 79.3. Yannick Noah leads on Longevity. Alex Olmedo leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Noah wins: Longevity
Olmedo wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alex-olmedo-vs-yannick-noah
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Noah leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇪 Olmedo | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 21 |
| 🇫🇷 Noah | 0 | 0 | 45 | 98 | 308 | 665 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OlmedoRetired | NoahRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | 1 | — |
| World ranking high | 1 | — |
| Career span in years | 11 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 1 |
| Career singles titles | — | 23 |
| Career doubles titles | — | 16 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 3 |
| Davis Cup titles as player | — | 0 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Yannick Noah leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.3 for Alex Olmedo — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Olmedo scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Noah leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Olmedo: 79.3, Noah: 79.4.
Make your case for Olmedo vs Noah. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.