Who is better, Dale Oen or Carrozza?
Alexander Dale Oen leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.9 for Coby Carrozza — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Alexander Dale Oen and Coby Carrozza level at 79.9. Alexander Dale Oen leads on Dominance, Peak. Coby Carrozza leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Dale Oen wins: Dominance, Peak
Carrozza wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alexander-dale-oen-vs-coby-carrozza
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Dale Oen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 Dale Oen | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 342 | 704 |
| 🇺🇸 Carrozza | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 358 | 698 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Dale OenRetired | CarrozzaActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| Norwegian records | 10 | — |
| Global finals contested | 8 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 2 |
| United States national medals | — | 4 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 1 |
| Relay finals | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 86 |
Alexander Dale Oen leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.9 for Coby Carrozza — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carrozza scores higher on statistics. Dale Oen leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dale Oen: 79.9, Carrozza: 79.9.
Make your case for Dale Oen vs Carrozza. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.