Who is better, Popov or Van Almsick?
Alexander Popov leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 88.0 for Franziska van Almsick — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Alexander Popov and Franziska van Almsick level at 88.0. Alexander Popov leads on Dominance. Franziska van Almsick leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Popov wins: Dominance
Van Almsick wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alexander-popov-vs-franziska-van-almsick
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Popov leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Popov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.3 | 87.64 | 175.84 |
| 🇩🇪 Van Almsick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 119.9 | 478.7 | 960.1 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PopovRetired | Van AlmsickRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | 9 | 10 |
| World Championship golds | 6 | 3 |
| World records | 4 | — |
| 50 m freestyle best (s) | 21.64 | — |
| European golds | 21 | — |
| European titles | — | 18 |
| 200 m freestyle world records | — | 2 |
| 200 m freestyle best | — | 118 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Alexander Popov leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 88.0 for Franziska van Almsick — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Van Almsick scores higher on peak, statistics. Popov leads on dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Popov: 88.0, Van Almsick: 88.0.
Make your case for Popov vs Van Almsick. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.