Who is better, Popov or Hveger?
Ragnhild Hveger leads with a GOAT score of 88.2 against 88.0 for Alexander Popov — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ragnhild Hveger above Alexander Popov: 88.2 vs 88.0. Ragnhild Hveger leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Alexander Popov leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hveger wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Popov wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/alexander-popov-vs-ragnhild-hveger
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hveger leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Popov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.3 | 87.64 | 175.84 |
| 🇩🇰 Hveger | 0 | 0 | 70 | 158 | 351 | 666 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PopovRetired | HvegerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | 9 | — |
| World Championship golds | 6 | — |
| World records | 4 | 42 |
| 50 m freestyle best (s) | 21.64 | — |
| European golds | 21 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 1 |
| European Championship golds | — | 5 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 2 |
| Danish national titles | — | 40 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 93 |
Ragnhild Hveger leads with a GOAT score of 88.2 against 88.0 for Alexander Popov — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Popov scores higher on honours, longevity. Hveger leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Popov: 88.0, Hveger: 88.2.
Make your case for Popov vs Hveger. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.