Who is better, Zverev or O'Hara Wood?
Arthur O'Hara Wood leads with a GOAT score of 74.9 against 74.8 for Alexander Zverev — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Arthur O'Hara Wood above Alexander Zverev: 74.9 vs 74.8. Arthur O'Hara Wood leads on Peak, Statistics, Honours. Alexander Zverev leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →O'Hara Wood wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Zverev wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/alexander-zverev-vs-arthur-ohara-wood
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
O'Hara Wood leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Zverev | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 20 |
| 🇦🇺 O'Hara Wood | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 31 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ZverevActive | O'Hara WoodRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Finals titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 7 | — |
| Career singles titles | 24 | — |
| Best world ranking | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Slam finals | — | 1 |
| National tournament wins | — | 4 |
| Career years | — | 7 |
| Australasian Championships played | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Arthur O'Hara Wood leads with a GOAT score of 74.9 against 74.8 for Alexander Zverev — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Zverev scores higher on dominance, longevity. O'Hara Wood leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Zverev: 74.8, O'Hara Wood: 74.9.
Make your case for Zverev vs O'Hara Wood. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.