Who is better, Zverev or Teacher?
Alexander Zverev leads with a GOAT score of 74.8 against 73.6 for Brian Teacher — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Alexander Zverev above Brian Teacher: 74.8 vs 73.6. Alexander Zverev leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Brian Teacher leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Zverev wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Teacher wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/alexander-zverev-vs-brian-teacher
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Zverev leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Zverev | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 20 |
| 🇺🇸 Teacher | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ZverevActive | TeacherRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Finals titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 7 | — |
| Career singles titles | 24 | — |
| Best world ranking | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| ATP singles titles | — | 8 |
| ATP doubles titles | — | 16 |
| Career-high ranking | — | 7 |
| Career match wins | — | 300 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 62 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Alexander Zverev leads with a GOAT score of 74.8 against 73.6 for Brian Teacher — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Teacher scores higher on peak, longevity. Zverev leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Zverev: 74.8, Teacher: 73.6.
Make your case for Zverev vs Teacher. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.