Who is better, Anderson or Arzamasova?
Alexandria Anderson leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Maryna Arzamasova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Alexandria Anderson and Maryna Arzamasova level at 81.1. Alexandria Anderson leads on Honours. Maryna Arzamasova leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Anderson wins: Honours
Arzamasova wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/alexandria-anderson-vs-maryna-arzamasova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Anderson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 336 | 636 |
| 🇧🇾 Arzamasova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 122 | 362.3 | 954.04 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndersonRetired | ArzamasovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | — |
| World relay medals | 2 | — |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| Personal best (100m) | 10.9 | — |
| United States national medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| European titles | — | 1 |
| European indoor medals | — | 2 |
| 800 m best | — | 117.54 |
| Olympic Games | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Alexandria Anderson leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Maryna Arzamasova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Arzamasova scores higher on peak. Anderson leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anderson: 81.1, Arzamasova: 81.1.
Make your case for Anderson vs Arzamasova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.