Who is better, Mac Allister or Banks?
Alexis Mac Allister leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.6 for Gordon Banks — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Mac Allister wins: Honours, Statistics
Banks wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/alexis-mac-allister-vs-gordon-banks
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mac Allister leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
Mac Allister is -69.6% behind Banks's pace at age 21
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | Mac AllisterActive | BanksRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup Winner | 1 | — |
| Copa América titles | 2 | — |
| Premier League apps | 110 | — |
| Career league goals | 39 | — |
| Argentina caps | 54 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| England caps | — | 73 |
| Career league appearances | — | 510 |
| League Cup titles | — | 1 |
| FWA Footballer of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 75 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 75 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 70 |
Alexis Mac Allister leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.6 for Gordon Banks — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Banks scores higher on peak, longevity. Mac Allister leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mac Allister: 78.6, Banks: 78.6.
Make your case for Mac Allister vs Banks. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.