Who is better, Kingscote or Kramer?
Algernon Kingscote leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.9 for Jack Kramer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Algernon Kingscote and Jack Kramer level at 82.9. Algernon Kingscote leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jack Kramer leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kingscote wins: Longevity, Statistics
Kramer wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/algernon-kingscote-vs-jack-kramer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kingscote leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Kingscote | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 298 | 622 |
| 🇺🇸 Kramer | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 224 | 653 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KingscoteRetired | KramerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| Wimbledon semi-finals | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup ties | 12 | — |
| Seasons played | 20 | — |
| World top-ten rankings | 4 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 3 |
| US Championships titles | — | 2 |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 1 |
| World professional titles | — | 4 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Algernon Kingscote leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.9 for Jack Kramer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kramer scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Kingscote leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kingscote: 82.9, Kramer: 82.9.
Make your case for Kingscote vs Kramer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.