Who is better, Guagni or Del Castillo?
Athenea del Castillo leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.5 for Alia Guagni — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Athenea del Castillo above Alia Guagni: 82.6 vs 82.5. Athenea del Castillo leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Alia Guagni leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Del Castillo wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Guagni wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/alia-guagni-v-vs-athenea-del-castillo-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Del Castillo leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Guagni | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 287 | 581 |
| 🇪🇸 Del Castillo | 0 | 0 | 52 | 111 | 327 | 684 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GuagniRetired | Del CastilloActive |
|---|---|---|
| Serie A titles | 1 | — |
| Coppa Italia titles | 3 | — |
| Italy caps | 90 | — |
| World Cup appearances | 1 | — |
| Career appearances | 350 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Nations League titles | — | 1 |
| Spain caps | — | 45 |
| Liga F goals | — | 50 |
| Spain goals | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 84 |
Athenea del Castillo leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.5 for Alia Guagni — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Guagni scores higher on longevity. Del Castillo leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Guagni: 82.5, Del Castillo: 82.6.
Make your case for Guagni vs Del Castillo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.