Who is better, Coutts or Ashwood?
Alicia Coutts leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.0 for Jessica Ashwood — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Alicia Coutts above Jessica Ashwood: 80.1 vs 80.0. Alicia Coutts leads on Honours. Jessica Ashwood leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Coutts wins: Honours
Ashwood wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alicia-coutts-vs-jessica-ashwood
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Coutts leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Coutts | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 291 | 693 |
| 🇦🇺 Ashwood | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 336 | 558 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CouttsRetired | AshwoodRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 5 | — |
| World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Commonwealth Games golds | 9 | — |
| Global finals contested | 12 | — |
| Commonwealth titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Australian titles | — | 5 |
| Olympic finals | — | 2 |
| Pan Pacific medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Alicia Coutts leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.0 for Jessica Ashwood — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ashwood scores higher on statistics, longevity. Coutts leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coutts: 80.1, Ashwood: 80.0.
Make your case for Coutts vs Ashwood. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.