Who is better, Coutts or Frölander?
Lars Frölander leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.1 for Alicia Coutts — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Coutts vs Frölander
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lars Frölander above Alicia Coutts: 80.2 vs 80.1. Lars Frölander leads on Longevity. Alicia Coutts leads on Honours, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FrölanderWinner
80.2Frölander wins: Longevity
Coutts
80.1Coutts wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to SwimmingShareable URL · /compare/alicia-coutts-vs-lars-frolander
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Lars Frölander
80.2
Frölander leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Lars Frölander
2. Alicia Coutts
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Alicia Coutts5 seasons played · career day 1,826387 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Lars Frölander5 seasons played · career day 1,826346 major golds
-10.6% vs Coutts at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Coutts | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 291 | 693 |
| 🇸🇪 Frölander | 0 | 0 | 56 | 118 | 264 | 700 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CouttsRetired | FrölanderRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | 1 |
| Olympic medals | 5 | — |
| World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Commonwealth Games golds | 9 | — |
| Global finals contested | 12 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 5 |
| Short course world titles | — | 6 |
| European Championship golds | — | 7 |
| Swedish records set | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Frölander80.2
Coutts80.1
FAQ
Where does Coutts beat Frölander?
Coutts scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Frölander leads on longevity.
How is the Coutts vs Frölander score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coutts: 80.1, Frölander: 80.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Coutts vs Frölander. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.