Who is better, Astafei or Adeniken?
Alina Astafei leads with a GOAT score of 79.3 against 79.3 for Olapade Adeniken — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Alina Astafei and Olapade Adeniken level at 79.3. Alina Astafei leads on Longevity. Olapade Adeniken leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Astafei wins: Longevity
Adeniken wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alina-astafei-vs-olapade-adeniken
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Astafei leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Astafei | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 342 | 706 |
| 🇳🇬 Adeniken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.3 | 80.45 | 161.85 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AstafeiRetired | AdenikenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 1 | — |
| World indoor medals | 3 | — |
| Personal best (m) | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Years at the top level | 16 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| 200 m personal best | — | 19.95 |
| 100 m personal best | — | 10.02 |
| African Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 86 |
Alina Astafei leads with a GOAT score of 79.3 against 79.3 for Olapade Adeniken — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Adeniken scores higher on peak, statistics. Astafei leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Astafei: 79.3, Adeniken: 79.3.
Make your case for Astafei vs Adeniken. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.