Who is better, Cerutti or Nalbert?
Alison Cerutti leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Nalbert Bitencourt — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cerutti vs Nalbert
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Alison Cerutti and Nalbert Bitencourt level at 86.3.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CeruttiWinner
86.3Cerutti wins: no category outright
Nalbert
86.3Nalbert wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to VolleyballShareable URL · /compare/alison-cerutti-vs-nalbert-bitencourt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇷 Alison Cerutti
86.3
Cerutti leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Alison Cerutti
2. Nalbert Bitencourt
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇧🇷 Alison Cerutti5 seasons played · career day 2,55630 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇷 Nalbert Bitencourt5 seasons played · career day 2,55529 titles
-3.3% vs Cerutti at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Cerutti | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 45 |
| 🇧🇷 Nalbert | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 44 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cerutti86.3
Nalbert86.3
FAQ
Where does Nalbert beat Cerutti?
Nalbert does not lead any of the five categories; Cerutti is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Cerutti vs Nalbert score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cerutti: 86.3, Nalbert: 86.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cerutti vs Nalbert. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.