Who is better, Blažević or Marta?
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 22.3 for Davor Blažević — a gap of 72.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Marta Vieira da Silva above Davor Blažević: 95.0 vs 22.3. Marta Vieira da Silva leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Marta wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Blažević wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/alls-davor-blazevic-vs-marta
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Marta leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Blažević — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Blažević — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BlaževićActive · IF Brommapojkarna | MartaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 33 | — |
| Shirt number | 25 | — |
| Senior years | 15 | — |
| Season | 2,026 | — |
| FIFA World Player awards | — | 6 |
| World Cup goals | — | 17 |
| Brazil caps | — | 200 |
| Brazil goals | — | 119 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World Cups played | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 19.7 | 96 |
| Peak w20% | 18.4 | 97 |
| Longevity w20% | 34.5 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 20.4 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 18 | 96 |
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 22.3 for Davor Blažević — a gap of 72.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Blažević does not lead any of the five categories; Marta is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Blažević: 22.3, Marta: 95.0.
Make your case for Blažević vs Marta. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.