Who is better, Fagerjord or Moore?
Bobby Moore leads with a GOAT score of 94.6 against 22.7 for Joackim Fagerjord — a gap of 71.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Fagerjord vs Moore
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bobby Moore above Joackim Fagerjord: 94.6 vs 22.7. Bobby Moore leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MooreWinner
94.6Moore wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Fagerjord
22.7Fagerjord wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/alls-joackim-fagerjord-vs-bobby-moore
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Bobby Moore
94.6
Moore leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Fagerjord — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Bobby Moore
2. Joackim Fagerjord
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🏴 Bobby Moore138 goals
5 seasons by age 21 · 27.6 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Fagerjord — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Moore94.6
Fagerjord22.7
FAQ
Where does Fagerjord beat Moore?
Fagerjord does not lead any of the five categories; Moore is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Fagerjord vs Moore score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fagerjord: 22.7, Moore: 94.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Fagerjord vs Moore. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.