Who is better, Milosavljević or Moore?
Bobby Moore leads with a GOAT score of 94.6 against 18.9 for Jovan Milosavljević — a gap of 75.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bobby Moore above Jovan Milosavljević: 94.6 vs 18.9. Bobby Moore leads on Longevity, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Moore wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Milosavljević wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/alls-jovan-milosavljevic-vs-bobby-moore
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Moore leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Milosavljević — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Milosavljević — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | MilosavljevićActive · Malmö FF | MooreRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 19 | — |
| Shirt number | 28 | — |
| Senior years | 1 | — |
| Season | 2,026 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| England caps | — | 108 |
| FWA Footballer awards | — | 1 |
| World Cup All-Star selections | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 24 | 95 |
| Peak w20% | 21.9 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 7.9 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 16.6 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 24.3 | 91 |
Bobby Moore leads with a GOAT score of 94.6 against 18.9 for Jovan Milosavljević — a gap of 75.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Milosavljević does not lead any of the five categories; Moore is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Milosavljević: 18.9, Moore: 94.6.
Make your case for Milosavljević vs Moore. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.