Who is better, (L) or Marta?
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 19.9 for Kasper Paananen (L) — a gap of 75.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
(L) vs Marta
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Marta Vieira da Silva above Kasper Paananen (L): 95.0 vs 19.9. Marta Vieira da Silva leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MartaWinner
95.0Marta wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
(L)
19.9(L) wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/alls-kasper-paananen-l-vs-marta
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇷 Marta Vieira da Silva
95.0
Marta leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
(L) — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Marta Vieira da Silva
2. Kasper Paananen (L)
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇧🇷 Marta Vieira da Silva89 goals
5 seasons by age 21 · 17.8 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for (L) — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Marta95.0
(L)19.9
FAQ
Where does (L) beat Marta?
(L) does not lead any of the five categories; Marta is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the (L) vs Marta score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. (L): 19.9, Marta: 95.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for (L) vs Marta. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.