Who is better, Ayana or Johnson?
Almaz Ayana leads with a GOAT score of 88.7 against 88.5 for Michael Johnson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Almaz Ayana above Michael Johnson: 88.7 vs 88.5. Almaz Ayana leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Michael Johnson leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ayana wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Johnson wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/almaz-ayana-vs-michael-johnson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ayana leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 Ayana | 0 | 0 | 45 | 104 | 262 | 619 |
| 🇺🇸 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88.38 | 306.33 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AyanaRetired | JohnsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| 10,000 metres world record in seconds | 1,717 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| World Championship golds | — | 8 |
| World records | — | 2 |
| 400 m personal best | — | 43.18 |
| 200 m personal best | — | 19.32 |
| Undefeated 400 m finals | — | 54 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 98 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 90 |
Almaz Ayana leads with a GOAT score of 88.7 against 88.5 for Michael Johnson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Johnson scores higher on honours, longevity. Ayana leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ayana: 88.7, Johnson: 88.5.
Make your case for Ayana vs Johnson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.