Who is better, Ayana or Crouser?
Almaz Ayana leads with a GOAT score of 88.7 against 88.7 for Ryan Crouser — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Almaz Ayana and Ryan Crouser level at 88.7. Almaz Ayana leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Ryan Crouser leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ayana wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Crouser wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/almaz-ayana-vs-ryan-crouser
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ayana leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 Ayana | 0 | 0 | 45 | 104 | 262 | 619 |
| 🇺🇸 Crouser | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45.17 | 136.93 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AyanaRetired | CrouserActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| 10,000 metres world record in seconds | 1,717 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| Shot put world record (m) | — | 23.56 |
| World indoor records | — | 1 |
| Throws over 23 m | — | 20 |
| Diamond League titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 98 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
Almaz Ayana leads with a GOAT score of 88.7 against 88.7 for Ryan Crouser — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Crouser scores higher on longevity. Ayana leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ayana: 88.7, Crouser: 88.7.
Make your case for Ayana vs Crouser. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.