Who is better, Gibson or McKinley?
Althea Gibson leads with a GOAT score of 78.0 against 78.0 for Chuck McKinley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Althea Gibson and Chuck McKinley level at 78.0. Althea Gibson leads on Dominance, Honours. Chuck McKinley leads on Peak, Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gibson wins: Dominance, Honours
McKinley wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/althea-gibson-vs-chuck-mckinley
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gibson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Gibson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 🇺🇸 McKinley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 25 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GibsonRetired | McKinleyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 5 | 1 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 6 | 1 |
| Wimbledon titles | 2 | — |
| US Championships titles | 2 | — |
| Year-end No. 1 finishes | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Career-high ranking | — | 1 |
| Davis Cup match wins | — | 29 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Althea Gibson leads with a GOAT score of 78.0 against 78.0 for Chuck McKinley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McKinley scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Gibson leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gibson: 78.0, McKinley: 78.0.
Make your case for Gibson vs McKinley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.