GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Gibson vs Paolini

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GibsonWinner
78.0

Gibson wins: Dominance, Honours

Paolini
76.9

Paolini wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/althea-gibson-vs-jasmine-paolini

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Althea Gibson
78.0

Gibson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. The first Black champion at Wimbledon and the US Championships.

1. Althea Gibson
78.0
2. Jasmine Paolini
76.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇮🇹 Jasmine Paolini5 seasons played · career day 2,9217 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Althea Gibson5 seasons played · career day 2,1900 titles
-100.0% vs Paolini at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Gibson000007
🇮🇹 Paolini0000210

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGibsonRetiredPaoliniActive
Grand Slam singles titles5
Grand Slam doubles titles6
Wimbledon titles2
US Championships titles2
Year-end No. 1 finishes2
Grand Slam finals2
Olympic golds1
Billie Jean King Cup titles2
WTA titles4
Career-high ranking4
Dominance w25%8074
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%6266
Honours w20%8078
Statistics w15%8080

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gibson78.0
Paolini76.9
The people
Gibson
Paolini

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Gibson vs Paolini. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →