Who is better, Baumgardner or St. John?
Alycia Baumgardner leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Mia St. John — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Alycia Baumgardner and Mia St. John level at 82.2. Alycia Baumgardner leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Mia St. John leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baumgardner wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
St. John wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alycia-baumgardner-vs-mia-st-john
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baumgardner leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Baumgardner | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 12 | 15 |
| 🇺🇸 St. John | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 285 | 617 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaumgardnerActive | St. JohnRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Undisputed titles | 1 | — |
| World titles won | 4 | — |
| Professional wins | 15 | — |
| Knockout wins | 7 | — |
| World title fights | 6 | — |
| World title reigns | — | 1 |
| Career wins | — | 49 |
| Career fights | — | 61 |
| Knockouts | — | 18 |
| Seasons active | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Alycia Baumgardner leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Mia St. John — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
St. John scores higher on statistics, longevity. Baumgardner leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baumgardner: 82.2, St. John: 82.2.
Make your case for Baumgardner vs St. John. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.