Who is better, Anderson or Irie?
Ryosuke Irie leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.9 for Alyssa Anderson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ryosuke Irie above Alyssa Anderson: 79.0 vs 78.9. Ryosuke Irie leads on Longevity. Alyssa Anderson leads on Honours, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Irie wins: Longevity
Anderson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alyssa-anderson-vs-ryosuke-irie
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Irie leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 363 | 418 |
| 🇯🇵 Irie | 0 | 0 | 70 | 154 | 324 | 748 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndersonRetired | IrieRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| NCAA titles | 3 | — |
| World University Games titles | 2 | — |
| US national medals | 3 | — |
| Pan Pacific medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| World Championship medals | — | 5 |
| Asian Games golds | — | 6 |
| Asian records set | — | 5 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Ryosuke Irie leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.9 for Alyssa Anderson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Anderson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Irie leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anderson: 78.9, Irie: 79.0.
Make your case for Anderson vs Irie. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.