Who is better, Healy or de Silva?
Alyssa Healy leads with a GOAT score of 88.6 against 88.5 for Aravinda de Silva — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Healy vs de Silva
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Alyssa Healy above Aravinda de Silva: 88.6 vs 88.5. Alyssa Healy leads on Honours, Dominance. Aravinda de Silva leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HealyWinner
88.6Healy wins: Dominance, Honours
de Silva
88.5de Silva wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/alyssa-healy-vs-aravinda-de-silva
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Alyssa Healy
88.6
Healy leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Alyssa Healy
2. Aravinda de Silva
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇱🇰 Aravinda de Silva5 years played · career day 1,826148 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Alyssa Healy5 years played · career day 2,921140 runs
-5.4% vs de Silva at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Healy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 180 |
| 🇱🇰 de Silva | 0 | 0 | 18 | 43 | 108 | 335 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Healy88.6
de Silva88.5
FAQ
Where does de Silva beat Healy?
de Silva scores higher on longevity. Healy leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Healy vs de Silva score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Healy: 88.6, de Silva: 88.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Healy vs de Silva. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.