Who is better, Anisimova or Pennetta?
Flavia Pennetta leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.1 for Amanda Anisimova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Flavia Pennetta above Amanda Anisimova: 81.2 vs 81.1. Flavia Pennetta leads on Longevity, Honours. Amanda Anisimova leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Pennetta wins: Longevity, Honours
Anisimova wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/amanda-anisimova-vs-flavia-pennetta
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pennetta leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Anisimova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 224 | 499 |
| 🇮🇹 Pennetta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AnisimovaActive | PennettaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam finals | 2 | — |
| WTA singles titles | 4 | — |
| Career high ranking | 4 | — |
| Grand Slam semi-finals | 3 | — |
| WTA 1000 titles | 1 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| WTA titles | — | 11 |
| Fed Cup titles | — | 4 |
| Doubles world No. 1 weeks | — | 4 |
| Career-high singles ranking | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
Flavia Pennetta leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.1 for Amanda Anisimova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Anisimova scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Pennetta leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anisimova: 81.1, Pennetta: 81.2.
Make your case for Anisimova vs Pennetta. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.