GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ilestedt vs Mazzola

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
IlestedtWinner
84.6

Ilestedt wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Mazzola
84.6

Mazzola wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/amanda-ilestedt-v-vs-sandro-mazzola

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Amanda Ilestedt
84.6

Ilestedt leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Named in the 2023 World Cup team of the tournament after scoring four goals.

1. Amanda Ilestedt
84.6
2. Sandro Mazzola
84.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇸🇪 Amanda Ilestedt5 seasons played · career day 1,825300 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Sandro Mazzola5 seasons played · career day 2,19156 goals
-81.3% vs Ilestedt at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 Ilestedt0052108300616
🇮🇹 Mazzola00042786

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricIlestedtActiveMazzolaRetired
World Cup medals1
World Cup goals4
Olympic medals1
Sweden caps100
League titles5
European Cups2
Serie A titles4
European Championship titles1
Italy caps70
Inter goals160
Dominance w25%8280
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%8286
Honours w20%8486
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Ilestedt84.6
Mazzola84.6
The people
Ilestedt
Mazzola

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ilestedt vs Mazzola. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →