Who is better, Serrano or Carney?
Jem Carney leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.2 for Amanda Serrano — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Serrano vs Carney
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jem Carney above Amanda Serrano: 86.3 vs 86.2. Jem Carney leads on Dominance, Peak. Amanda Serrano leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CarneyWinner
86.3Carney wins: Dominance, Peak
Serrano
86.2Serrano wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/amanda-serrano-vs-jem-carney
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Jem Carney
86.3
Carney leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jem Carney
2. Amanda Serrano
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Jem Carney5 years played · career day 1,826307 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇷 Amanda Serrano5 years played · career day 1,82517 title wins
-94.5% vs Carney at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇷 Serrano | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 17 | 30 |
| 🇬🇧 Carney | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 234 | 653 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Carney86.3
Serrano86.2
FAQ
Where does Serrano beat Carney?
Serrano scores higher on honours, longevity. Carney leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Serrano vs Carney score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Serrano: 86.2, Carney: 86.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Serrano vs Carney. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.