Who is better, Stoudemire or Oberto?
Fabricio Oberto leads with a GOAT score of 78.3 against 78.2 for Amar'e Stoudemire — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Fabricio Oberto above Amar'e Stoudemire: 78.3 vs 78.2. Fabricio Oberto leads on Longevity, Honours. Amar'e Stoudemire leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Oberto wins: Longevity, Honours
Stoudemire wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/amare-stoudemire-vs-fabricio-oberto
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Oberto leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Stoudemire | 0 | 0 | 13.5 | 34.1 | 89.5 | 184.5 |
| 🇦🇷 Oberto | 0 | 0 | 44 | 96 | 288 | 630 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | StoudemireRetired | ObertoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 6 | — |
| Rookie of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| All-NBA first teams | 1 | — |
| Points per game | 18.9 | — |
| Career points | 15,994 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| NBA championships | — | 1 |
| Spanish league titles | — | 3 |
| Argentina caps | — | 120 |
| NBA seasons | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 74 |
Fabricio Oberto leads with a GOAT score of 78.3 against 78.2 for Amar'e Stoudemire — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stoudemire scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Oberto leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Stoudemire: 78.2, Oberto: 78.3.
Make your case for Stoudemire vs Oberto. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.