GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Anning vs Taylor

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AnningWinner
82.1

Anning wins: Peak, Statistics

Taylor
82.0

Taylor wins: Dominance, Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Athletics

Shareable URL · /compare/amber-anning-vs-christian-taylor

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Amber Anning
82.1

Anning leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic relay bronze medallist and British 400 metres champion.

1. Amber Anning
82.1
2. Christian Taylor
82.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Major golds per season

Career timeline · Major golds per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Major golds per season
1. 🇬🇧 Amber Anning5 seasons played · career day 1,825353 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Christian Taylor5 seasons played · career day 2,19088.6 major golds
-74.9% vs Anning at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Anning0055118353717
🇺🇸 Taylor00017.4570.88142.38

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAnningActiveTaylorActive
Olympic medals1
World Championship medals2
NCAA titles2
British titles2
European medals1
Olympic golds2
World titles4
Personal best (m)18.21
Diamond League titles4
World medals5
Dominance w25%8082
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%7276
Honours w20%8484
Statistics w15%8682

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Anning82.1
Taylor82.0
The people
Anning
Taylor

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Anning vs Taylor. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →