Who is better, Anning or Adkins?
Amber Anning leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Derrick Adkins — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Amber Anning above Derrick Adkins: 82.1 vs 82.0. Amber Anning leads on Longevity, Statistics. Derrick Adkins leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Anning wins: Longevity, Statistics
Adkins wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/amber-anning-vs-derrick-adkins
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Anning leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Anning | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 353 | 717 |
| 🇺🇸 Adkins | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 359 | 703 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AnningActive | AdkinsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| British titles | 2 | — |
| European medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World outdoor titles | — | 1 |
| US national titles | — | 2 |
| Personal best (s) | — | 47.54 |
| Global finals contested | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Amber Anning leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Derrick Adkins — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Adkins scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Anning leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anning: 82.1, Adkins: 82.0.
Make your case for Anning vs Adkins. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.