GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Mauresmo vs Wozniacki

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WozniackiWinner
76.1

Wozniacki wins: Dominance, Statistics

Mauresmo
75.7

Mauresmo wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/amelie-mauresmo-vs-caroline-wozniacki

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇰 Caroline Wozniacki
76.1

Wozniacki leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. 71 weeks at world No. 1, crowned by the 2018 Australian Open.

1. Caroline Wozniacki
76.1
2. Amélie Mauresmo
75.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇩🇰 Caroline Wozniacki5 seasons played · career day 2,92117 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇷 Amélie Mauresmo5 seasons played · career day 3,6519 titles
-47.1% vs Wozniacki at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇫🇷 Mauresmo000006
🇩🇰 Wozniacki0000419

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMauresmoRetiredWozniackiActive
Grand Slam titles21
Career titles25
Weeks at No. 13971
Olympic medals1
Tour Finals titles1
Fed Cups1
Career singles titles30
WTA Finals titles1
Career match wins620
Dominance w25%7072
Peak w20%8282
Longevity w20%7878
Honours w20%7472
Statistics w15%7678

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Wozniacki76.1
Mauresmo75.7
The people
Mauresmo
Wozniacki

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Mauresmo vs Wozniacki. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →