Who is better, Mauresmo or Martić?
Amélie Mauresmo leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.5 for Petra Martić — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Amélie Mauresmo above Petra Martić: 75.7 vs 75.5. Amélie Mauresmo leads on Honours, Dominance. Petra Martić leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mauresmo wins: Dominance, Honours
Martić wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/amelie-mauresmo-vs-petra-martic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mauresmo leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Mauresmo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 🇭🇷 Martić | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 400 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MauresmoRetired | MartićActive |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 2 | — |
| Career titles | 25 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 39 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Tour Finals titles | 1 | — |
| Fed Cups | 1 | — |
| WTA singles titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Slam quarter-finals | — | 1 |
| Career high ranking | — | 14 |
| WTA finals reached | — | 4 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 18 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 66 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 84 |
Amélie Mauresmo leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.5 for Petra Martić — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Martić scores higher on statistics, longevity. Mauresmo leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mauresmo: 75.7, Martić: 75.5.
Make your case for Mauresmo vs Martić. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.