Who is better, Mauresmo or Hamilton?
Amélie Mauresmo leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.4 for Willoughby Hamilton — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Amélie Mauresmo above Willoughby Hamilton: 75.7 vs 75.4. Amélie Mauresmo leads on Longevity. Willoughby Hamilton leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mauresmo wins: Longevity
Hamilton wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/amelie-mauresmo-vs-willoughby-hamilton
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mauresmo leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Mauresmo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 🇮🇪 Hamilton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MauresmoRetired | HamiltonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 2 | 1 |
| Career titles | 25 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 39 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Tour Finals titles | 1 | — |
| Fed Cups | 1 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 1 |
| Irish Championships titles | — | 2 |
| Career span in years | — | 10 |
| Wimbledon finals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 58 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 78 |
Amélie Mauresmo leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.4 for Willoughby Hamilton — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hamilton scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Mauresmo leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mauresmo: 75.7, Hamilton: 75.4.
Make your case for Mauresmo vs Hamilton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.