Who is better, Khan or Jonas?
Natasha Jonas leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.3 for Amir Khan — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Khan vs Jonas
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Natasha Jonas above Amir Khan: 80.4 vs 80.3. Natasha Jonas leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Amir Khan leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
JonasWinner
80.4Jonas wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Khan
80.3Khan wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/amir-khan-vs-natasha-jonas
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Natasha Jonas
80.4
Jonas leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Natasha Jonas
2. Amir Khan
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Amir Khan5 years played · career day 1,82521 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Natasha Jonas5 years played · career day 1,82513 title wins
-38.1% vs Khan at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Khan | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 21 | 29 |
| 🇬🇧 Jonas | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Jonas80.4
Khan80.3
FAQ
Where does Khan beat Jonas?
Khan scores higher on longevity. Jonas leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Khan vs Jonas score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Khan: 80.3, Jonas: 80.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Khan vs Jonas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.