Who is better, Rodriguez or Schüller?
Amy Rodriguez leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.3 for Lea Schüller — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Amy Rodriguez and Lea Schüller level at 85.3. Amy Rodriguez leads on Honours, Longevity. Lea Schüller leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Rodriguez wins: Longevity, Honours
Schüller wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/amy-rodriguez-v-vs-lea-schuller-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Rodriguez leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Rodriguez | 0 | 0 | 52 | 110 | 317 | 664 |
| 🇩🇪 Schüller | 0 | 0 | 52 | 110 | 319 | 672 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RodriguezRetired | SchüllerActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| NWSL titles | 2 | — |
| United States caps | 132 | — |
| United States goals | 30 | — |
| Bundesliga titles | — | 4 |
| Germany caps | — | 75 |
| Germany goals | — | 50 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Bundesliga top scorer awards | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Amy Rodriguez leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.3 for Lea Schüller — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Schüller scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Rodriguez leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rodriguez: 85.3, Schüller: 85.3.
Make your case for Rodriguez vs Schüller. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.