Who is better, Ambrazienė or James?
Ana Ambrazienė leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.7 for Kirani James — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ana Ambrazienė above Kirani James: 83.8 vs 83.7. Ana Ambrazienė leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Kirani James leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ambrazienė wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
James wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ana-ambraziene-vs-kirani-james
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ambrazienė leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇹 Ambrazienė | 0 | 0 | 45 | 103 | 358 | 614 |
| 🇬🇩 James | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 132.04 | 308.05 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AmbrazienėRetired | JamesActive |
|---|---|---|
| World records set | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Soviet titles | 3 | — |
| Personal best in seconds | 5,420 | — |
| World ranking number ones | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| 400m best (sec) | — | 43.74 |
| World junior titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Ana Ambrazienė leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.7 for Kirani James — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
James scores higher on honours, longevity. Ambrazienė leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ambrazienė: 83.8, James: 83.7.
Make your case for Ambrazienė vs James. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.