Who is better, Bjelica or Carneiro?
Ana Bjelica leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.8 for Macris Carneiro — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Bjelica vs Carneiro
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ana Bjelica and Macris Carneiro level at 82.8. Ana Bjelica leads on Honours. Macris Carneiro leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BjelicaWinner
82.8Bjelica wins: Honours
Carneiro
82.8Carneiro wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to VolleyballShareable URL · /compare/ana-bjelica-vs-macris-carneiro
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇸 Ana Bjelica
82.8
Bjelica leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ana Bjelica
2. Macris Carneiro
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇷🇸 Ana Bjelica5 seasons played · career day 1,825301 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇷 Macris Carneiro5 seasons played · career day 2,92130 titles
-90.0% vs Bjelica at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇸 Bjelica | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 301 | 635 |
| 🇧🇷 Carneiro | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 37 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Bjelica82.8
Carneiro82.8
FAQ
Where does Carneiro beat Bjelica?
Carneiro scores higher on longevity. Bjelica leads on honours.
How is the Bjelica vs Carneiro score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bjelica: 82.8, Carneiro: 82.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bjelica vs Carneiro. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.