Who is better, ana or Skadoodle?
Tyler "Skadoodle" Latham leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.2 for Anathan "ana" Pham — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tyler "Skadoodle" Latham above Anathan "ana" Pham: 85.3 vs 85.2. Tyler "Skadoodle" Latham leads on Longevity, Statistics. Anathan "ana" Pham leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Skadoodle wins: Longevity, Statistics
ana wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ana-dota-vs-es-skadoodle
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Skadoodle leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 ana | 0 | 0 | 66 | 146 | 336 | 466 |
| 🇺🇸 Skadoodle | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 368 | 555 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | anaRetired | SkadoodleRetired |
|---|---|---|
| The International titles | 2 | — |
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| The International appearances | 4 | — |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 6 | — |
| Professional seasons | 6 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Major MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Big tournament titles | — | 5 |
| Seasons played | — | 8 |
| Major playoff appearances | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Tyler "Skadoodle" Latham leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.2 for Anathan "ana" Pham — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
ana scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Skadoodle leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. ana: 85.2, Skadoodle: 85.3.
Make your case for ana vs Skadoodle. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.