Who is better, Alvares or Brakočević?
Ana Ida Alvares leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.4 for Jovana Brakočević — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ana Ida Alvares above Jovana Brakočević: 84.5 vs 84.4. Ana Ida Alvares leads on Longevity, Honours. Jovana Brakočević leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Alvares wins: Longevity, Honours
Brakočević wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ana-ida-alvares-vs-jovana-brakocevic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Alvares leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Alvares | 0 | 0 | 52 | 110 | 242 | 660 |
| 🇷🇸 Brakočević | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 42 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlvaresRetired | BrakočevićRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | 1 |
| World Grand Prix titles | 1 | — |
| Pan American gold medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| Brazilian league titles | 4 | — |
| European titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Champions League medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Ana Ida Alvares leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.4 for Jovana Brakočević — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brakočević scores higher on peak, statistics. Alvares leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alvares: 84.5, Brakočević: 84.4.
Make your case for Alvares vs Brakočević. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.