Who is better, Connelly or Birarelli?
Ana Paula Connelly leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Emanuele Birarelli — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ana Paula Connelly and Emanuele Birarelli level at 81.9. Ana Paula Connelly leads on Dominance, Peak. Emanuele Birarelli leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Connelly wins: Dominance, Peak
Birarelli wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ana-paula-connelly-vs-emanuele-birarelli
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Connelly leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Connelly | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 387 | 725 |
| 🇮🇹 Birarelli | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 50 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ConnellyRetired | BirarelliRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 1 |
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| World Tour wins | 20 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Years at the top level | 16 | — |
| World League titles | — | 1 |
| Italian league titles | — | 2 |
| Champions League titles | — | 1 |
| Seasons played | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Ana Paula Connelly leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Emanuele Birarelli — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Birarelli scores higher on statistics, longevity. Connelly leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Connelly: 81.9, Birarelli: 81.9.
Make your case for Connelly vs Birarelli. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.