Who is better, Connelly or Walkenhorst?
Ana Paula Connelly leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Kira Walkenhorst — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Connelly vs Walkenhorst
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ana Paula Connelly and Kira Walkenhorst level at 81.9. Ana Paula Connelly leads on Longevity. Kira Walkenhorst leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ConnellyWinner
81.9Connelly wins: Longevity
Walkenhorst
81.9Walkenhorst wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to VolleyballShareable URL · /compare/ana-paula-connelly-vs-kira-walkenhorst
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇷 Ana Paula Connelly
81.9
Connelly leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ana Paula Connelly
2. Kira Walkenhorst
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇧🇷 Ana Paula Connelly5 seasons played · career day 1,825387 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇪 Kira Walkenhorst5 seasons played · career day 1,825328 titles
-15.2% vs Connelly at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Connelly | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 387 | 725 |
| 🇩🇪 Walkenhorst | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 328 | 688 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ConnellyRetired | WalkenhorstRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | 1 | 1 |
| World Tour wins | 20 | 7 |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Years at the top level | 16 | 13 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Connelly81.9
Walkenhorst81.9
FAQ
Where does Walkenhorst beat Connelly?
Walkenhorst scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Connelly leads on longevity.
How is the Connelly vs Walkenhorst score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Connelly: 81.9, Walkenhorst: 81.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Connelly vs Walkenhorst. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.