Who is better, Bondarchuk or Sekachova?
Anatoliy Bondarchuk leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Iryna Sekachova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Anatoliy Bondarchuk and Iryna Sekachova level at 81.5. Anatoliy Bondarchuk leads on Dominance, Peak. Iryna Sekachova leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bondarchuk wins: Dominance, Peak
Sekachova wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/anatoliy-bondarchuk-vs-iryna-sekachova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bondarchuk leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇦 Bondarchuk | 0 | 0 | 60 | 128 | 380 | 732 |
| 🇺🇦 Sekachova | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 294 | 610 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BondarchukRetired | SekachovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| European Championship golds | 1 | — |
| World records set | 2 | — |
| Personal best hammer | 75.48 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Ukrainian titles | — | 6 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 3 |
| Personal best (m) | — | 74 |
| World Championship finals | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Anatoliy Bondarchuk leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Iryna Sekachova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sekachova scores higher on statistics, longevity. Bondarchuk leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bondarchuk: 81.5, Sekachova: 81.5.
Make your case for Bondarchuk vs Sekachova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.