Who is better, Barzagli or Immobile?
Andrea Barzagli leads with a GOAT score of 87.2 against 87.2 for Ciro Immobile — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Andrea Barzagli and Ciro Immobile level at 87.2. Andrea Barzagli leads on Honours, Longevity. Ciro Immobile leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Barzagli wins: Longevity, Honours
Immobile wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/andrea-barzagli-v-vs-ciro-immobile-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Barzagli leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Barzagli | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 224 | 591 |
| 🇮🇹 Immobile | 0 | 0 | 52 | 108 | 232 | 609 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BarzagliRetired | ImmobileActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Serie A titles | 8 | — |
| Italy caps | 73 | — |
| Coppa Italia titles | 4 | — |
| Career appearances | 550 | — |
| European Golden Shoe awards | — | 1 |
| Serie A top scorer awards | — | 4 |
| Serie A goals | — | 201 |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Career goals | — | 320 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 92 |
Andrea Barzagli leads with a GOAT score of 87.2 against 87.2 for Ciro Immobile — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Immobile scores higher on peak, statistics. Barzagli leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Barzagli: 87.2, Immobile: 87.2.
Make your case for Barzagli vs Immobile. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.