Who is better, de Cesaris or Piquet Jr?
Nelson Piquet Jr leads with a GOAT score of 70.8 against 70.6 for Andrea de Cesaris — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nelson Piquet Jr above Andrea de Cesaris: 70.8 vs 70.6. Nelson Piquet Jr leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Andrea de Cesaris leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Piquet Jr wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
de Cesaris wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/andrea-de-cesaris-vs-nelson-piquet-jr
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Piquet Jr leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 de Cesaris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 31 |
| 🇧🇷 Piquet Jr | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | de CesarisRetired | Piquet JrRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix starts | 208 | — |
| Podiums | 5 | — |
| Pole positions | 1 | — |
| Career points | 59 | — |
| Seasons contested | 15 | — |
| Formula E titles | — | 1 |
| Grands Prix entered | — | 28 |
| Formula 1 podiums | — | 1 |
| Career F1 points | — | 19 |
| GP2 runner-up finishes | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 58 | 62 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 52 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 78 |
Nelson Piquet Jr leads with a GOAT score of 70.8 against 70.6 for Andrea de Cesaris — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
de Cesaris scores higher on longevity. Piquet Jr leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. de Cesaris: 70.6, Piquet Jr: 70.8.
Make your case for de Cesaris vs Piquet Jr. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.