Who is better, Gardini or Rosenthal?
Sean Rosenthal leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.0 for Andrea Gardini — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sean Rosenthal above Andrea Gardini: 86.1 vs 86.0. Sean Rosenthal leads on Longevity, Statistics. Andrea Gardini leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Rosenthal wins: Longevity, Statistics
Gardini wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/andrea-gardini-vs-sean-rosenthal
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Rosenthal leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Gardini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 20 |
| 🇺🇸 Rosenthal | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 306 | 632 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GardiniRetired | RosenthalRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 3 | — |
| World League titles | 7 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 3 | — |
| Champions League titles | 3 | — |
| AVP titles | — | 27 |
| World Tour titles | — | 4 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| AVP MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Career seasons | — | 18 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Sean Rosenthal leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.0 for Andrea Gardini — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gardini scores higher on dominance, honours. Rosenthal leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gardini: 86.0, Rosenthal: 86.1.
Make your case for Gardini vs Rosenthal. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.